As the Landauers struggle for survival abroad, their home slips from hand to hand, from Czech to Nazi to Soviet possession and finally back to the Czechoslovak state, with new inhabitants always falling under the fervent and unrelenting influence of the Glass Room. Its crystalline perfection exerts a gravitational pull on those who know it, inspiring them, freeing them, calling them back, until the Landauers themselves are finally drawn home to where their story began.
First Line: "Oh yes, we're here."
Random Quote: "Will they invade? They won't invade because they won't need to invade."
Review: Ponderous cliched writing and relentless, predictable foreboding doomed this read for me. The story of the Landauers, wealthy industrialist patrons of the arts who hire an avant-garde architect to build them a modernist masterpiece of a house could have been compelling, but was somehow so pretentious that I couldn't muster up the energy to care about either of them. Sadly, the people that follow them in the story weren't worth caring about for me, either.
Villa Tugendhat - Brno, Czechoslovakia - Image by LokoN Only One via FlickrThe architect in the novel is modeled after Mies van der Rohe, the house is modeled after the Tugendhat House in Brno. There is a glass room in the house that Mawer uses as the transparent stage for all of the characters in this book that ranges over time through the Holocaust and into the next century. The metaphor is crystal clear, but what the author does with it just wasn't compelling for me. I didn't care about anyone in this book or anything that happened. Instead, I spent most of the book pondering the modernist aesthetic in architecture, painting, and sculpture and whether or not it has held up over time. This pondering was only loosely inspired by the book's subject matter and, I suspect, was more likely my imagination's way of keeping my brain occupied while I ploughed through this book.
I know that lots of people really loved this book and it was shortlisted for the 2009 Man Booker Prize, but for me it was torturous and awful. I gave it two stars because the modernist aesthetic is interesting to think about and I hadn't done so in awhile. I don't think that's a ringing endorsement.
Reading Challenges: The Complete Booker 2010 Challenge, Historical Reading Challenge 2010, 2010 100+ Reading Challenge, 2010 A to Z Reading Challenge, 2010 Support Your Local Library Reading Challenge, Typically British Reading Challenge

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=aabd5d35-2fb6-41b7-9ca8-fcd046a3bad6)
OMG...so sorry u were disappointed. I plan to read it in 2010.
ReplyDeleteI am amazed how quickly you are whizzing through these Booker shortlisted books.
ReplyDeleteI am sorry this one didn't suit you. I might leave this one until last.
@Vivienne - They were at the library at the same time so I grabbed 'em. Plus I'm stressed out right now so I'm reading a lot - it's escape!
ReplyDelete@Diane - It might just be me or mood, I'm not sure, but it definitely rubbed me the wrong way. Ah well, every book isn't for everyone - that's the beauty of it.